Sometimes, it happens that students don’t want to write a reflective paper, because they have to tell about negative emotions or bad life experience. If you don’t like the film you have watched or the trainings you have taken part in, don’t write about this in your academic paper. You may just narrate about the issue itself and then add your personal, professional concern about certain facts that you don’t like in it.
If you don’t know how to create an excellent self reflection paper, read our tips and clues how to do well on this task.
Reflection Paper Sample.
You can also add an outline to make your paper look more refined.
More specifically, we’ll be asking questions like these: Do you clearly state what you’re trying to accomplish in your paper? Is it obvious to the reader what your main thesis is?
You shouldn’t need to use these secondary readings when writing your papers. The point of the papers is to teach you how to analyze a philosophical argument, and present your own arguments for or against some conclusion. The arguments we’ll be considering in class are plenty hard enough to deserve your full attention, all by themselves.
Use technical philosophical terms only where you need them. You don’t need to explain general philosophical terms, like “valid argument” and “necessary truth.” But you should explain any technical terms you use which bear on the specific topic you’re discussing. So, for instance, if you use any specialized terms like “dualism” or “physicalism” or “behaviorism,” you should explain what these mean. Likewise if you use technical terms like “supervenience” and the like. Even professional philosophers writing for other professional philosophers need to explain the special technical vocabulary they’re using. Different people sometimes use this special vocabulary in different ways, so it’s important to make sure that you and your readers are all giving these words the same meaning. Pretend that your readers have never heard them before.
Formulate the central problem or question you wish to address at the beginning of your paper, and keep it in mind at all times. Make it clear what the problem is, and why it is a problem. Be sure that everything you write is relevant to that central problem. In addition, be sure to say in the paper how it is relevant. Don’t make your reader guess.
When you use an unfamiliar or “technical” term (i.e. a term that we have given some specific meaning in this class) be sure to define it.
In the Meno , Meno presents Socrates with a paradox about inquiry. There is no way to inquire into something that you don’t know, since you don’t know how to begin, but there is also no way to inquire into something that you already know, since you already have the knowledge in question. Thus, we reach the paradoxical conclusion that inquiry is impossible. Socrates attempts to unravel Meno’s paradox by presenting his theory of recollection. In what follows, I will discuss Meno’s paradox and Socrates’ criticism of it.
Don’t end with a hedged claim like “Though Socrates’ argument is strong, his opponents also have good points.” Also try to avoid the temptation to end with an empty prediction about continued debate: “Though Meno’s definition of virtue is a good one, the philosophical debate over what it means to be virtuous will no doubt continue.”
[Notice that the conclusion does not claim that Socrates’ claim is shown to be false, but only that Socrates has not adequately defended it.]
If you want to succeed in writing a philosophy paper, you should follow a certain algorithm. This is a set of tips, clues and rules that will explain you how to write a philosophy paper to impress your teacher or professor.
Another situation where philosophy paper samples may be very helpful is when you need to format your paper. Formatting your paper is often as challenging as the writing itself, and seeing a perfectly formatted APA philosophy paper sample can work better for you than even the most detailed explanation.
Some students try to prove the rightness of their thesis by using too many facts. It’s a so-called ‘fortress approach’ that also leads to a total failure. For example, it seems that you have used quite a lot of arguments in your educational philosophy paper, but all of them aren’t discussed properly. In addition, you haven’t sorted them into strong and weak ones, and your reader can’t find your own thoughts and ideas you have written in your paper.
Present, Explain, and Evaluate – Writing a Short Philosophy Paper.
I have learned a great deal of materials in Dr. Whipple’s English 150 class. In his class, we read articles and wrote reflections about topics pertaining to literature, technology, and literacies. This allowed me to become a better critical thinker because his course requires us to analyze and reflect on readings more than just giving a brief summary about them. After taking this course for about three months, I have realized that it had made a significant change in my life. When I am attending in classes such as political science or philosophy, not only am I understanding the readings better than before but I am also analyzing the information, forming my own thoughts (at times I even present my ideas to the members in class), and incorporating ideas from the past to increase the literacy towards the topic that I would’ve given up in the past. I value the qualities that this English course gifts to the students because it has improved me as a student, learner, and as an active member in the society.
Lastly, I also want to thank this class since I learned what type of learner I am. After watching a youtube video that was assigned, I realized that I enjoy retaining information from viewing videos. Besides a video, I also enjoy learning from diagrams and charts to analyze information on various topics like philosophy and political science. For example, I can understand the game theory by examining a visual diagram. I also realized that I am not a good audio learner since I had a hard time understanding, focusing, and listening to the podcast by Nicholson Baker.
The amount of things I have learned in this class is immense and to briefly summarize what I learned in class, I would have to claim that I learned how to learn. I have a better understanding on how various ways of in taking information can lead to various versions of understanding. For example, I believe that the third weekly comment enables the student to look at both sides of arguments and form opinions from incorporating his or her general knowledge and personal values to new information that was retained recently. The third weekly comment asked us if we agree or disagree with the author about the requirements of innovation of technology. When I read and wrote about Wendell Berry’s article, I realized the positive and negative sides of technology and also was able to create a clear distinction between the author’s ideas and mine. By doing the two things, it enables me to precisely understand and create stronger belief or certainty towards my knowledge and my values. Besides this, there is another way of learning, which is called reflecting. In this class, most of his assignments are about making a reflection about the article but that is not the type of reflecting that I am trying to purvey. The reflections that I am talking about are ones such as weekly comment five and this paper four. These two assignments are asking about what we have learned in the past. When I turn in my weekly comments, I also have a word document saved into the Dropbox so that I can always look back to what I have claimed in the past. When I look at my formed ideas from the past once in a while, I realize about two things. Sometimes, I have new knowledge that I want to incorporate into my past ideas by editing my previous papers. At other times, I realize that I have new ideas that contradict with the previous ones and I chose to edit my paper and save it as another copy. When this happens, I enjoy looking at both drafts and comparing and contrasting two beliefs that both came from my head. Reflections are useful because not only does it create a stronger understanding but it also creates a different dimensions or views of beliefs.
It’s also possible that you’ve had few if any brushes with the welfare system. But you still should have some familiarity with it, sources of information that have informed your views. Maybe you’ve had friends who’ve received assistance, maybe your parents or relatives, maybe it’s just what you’ve read about or seen on TV, what you’ve gleaned from books, heard on talk radio, or with brushes with homeless people in a big city, etc., but you have some familiarity, and I’m interested in just how close and intimate you have come to the welfare system. In this part of the paper, I’m looking for thoughtfulness, description,
Third , I want you to reflect on how your own experiences, whether frequent or very limited, have affected your attitudes on welfare. In other words, I want to know where your attitudes come from. If you haven’t given it much thought, you need to state that, and perhaps explore any disconnects between your experiences and your own philosophy. The broader idea of this assignment is to give you some space to explore how you formulate opinions on important issues—through reading, personal direct experience, interactions with other people, work experiences, religious or cultural background, the mass media, etc. So I want to know: 1) What are the bases of your opinions/attitudes about welfare? Are they anchored in any personal values you hold? 2) Have your attitudes changed over time? As you are confronted with new information, do you re-consider your opinions and values? 3) Do you think it’s important for those working in the welfare system to have a thoughtful philosophy about welfare? Or is it enough that they just perform according to their job descriptions? What would the three most important areas, according to you, that welfare professionals should have developed some thoughtful opinions? Worth 20 points .
and your impressions, given what we discuss in this class. In other words, you should have some insight into your experiences based on whatever contact you’ve had with welfare services (or lack of), guided by course content. You should spend at least a page on this part. This part is worth 20 points .
You’ll do a few things on the reflection paper. First , I want to you to discuss and analyze your closest personal brushes with the welfare system. This could be as a recipient of various kinds of services (and you need to think broadly, ask if in doubt, about what might constitute welfare), SSI, food stamps, reduced fare lunches, a trip to the food bank, WIC, TANF, social security payments, Medicaid, veterans’ benefits, workers’ compensation, unemployment, etc. Services don’t necessarily have to be public—they could come from non-profits, from a church or other religious entity, etc. Put some effort and thought into this part, and describe the details of accessing services, your interactions with agencies, time frames, etc.